Blog Layout

State v. May, Court of Appeals Holds That a Police Officer can be Sufficiently Qualified to Draw Blood

azduicenter • Jul 22, 2005

Background

Late one evening in November 2002, a Pima County sheriff’s deputy saw defendant May driving in excess of the speed limit. He pulled behind May’s vehicle, saw it temporarily veer off the road, and directed May to stop. In May’s car were two passengers: an adult female and a minor male.

Another officer arrived on the scene and arrested May for DUI after observing symptoms of intoxication. During the investigation, an adult male appeared on the scene and told the arresting officer the male passenger was his 13-year-old son. With May’s consent, Deputy Curtin, a sheriff’s department phlebotomist, drew a sample of May’s blood at the scene. Testing showed he had a 0.195 percent blood-alcohol concentration.

Attempts to Suppress the Blood Test Results

May challenged the blood test results, claiming the seizure of his blood violated the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.  May argued the procedure used to take his blood sample was not “performed in a reasonable manner” and that violated his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure.

Court’s Ruling

The trial court found the seizure reasonable because the procedure Curtin used resulted in only a “slightly higher” risk of complications “in a field setting” than those of a clinical setting.

The Court of Appeals found no basis for disturbing that ruling. The court reasoned that May consented to having his blood drawn. And Curtin testified that, based on his knowledge and training, the standard of care required him to clean the arm and not cause any injury to the patient. In addition, a witness testified that on-site and clinical testing are equally reliable, and both present possible risks to the patient but, in her opinion, “the risk of injury goes up” with on-site testing.

May also argued that the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress because Curtin was not a trained phlebotomist. However, the Court of Appeals responded by stating that, in Arizona, a physician, registered nurse, or other “qualified person” may withdraw blood from the operator of a vehicle to determine his or her alcohol concentration under Arizona law. See A.R.S. 28-1388(A).

In sum, the Court of Appeals ruled that: (1) the blood draw conducted by the deputy while the defendant and deputy stood at the rear of the police car was not performed in an unreasonable manner; and (2) the deputy was sufficiently qualified as a person competent to draw blood to determine the defendant’s blood-alcohol concentration after the traffic stop.

The case was, however, sent back to the trial court because the State failed to prove another element of the case.

By Lawrence Koplow 09 Sep, 2020
The reported results of a BAC test in DUI cases appear to provide the answer we are seeking: how much ethanol is in a person’s blood.  However, let’s look at the fine print. The Reported Results A machine called a gas chromatograph is used to measure an alcohol concentration in blood samples.   The measurement, which […] The post Reported Result vs. Complete Result appeared first on Lawrence Koplow: Arizona DUI Attorney | Phoenix & Scottsdale.
By Lawrence Koplow 05 Sep, 2020
The appearance of science can become the appearance of truth - even when the junk science is employed. Do we provide enough bandwidth to debunk these unreliable scientific claims? The post A Legal Bandwidth Problem appeared first on Lawrence Koplow: Arizona DUI Attorney | Phoenix & Scottsdale.
By Lawrence Koplow 27 Aug, 2020
Measuring is different from counting. However, in forensic science the two are often suggested to be the same. This needs to change. MEASURING Measuring is the assignment of a number, and all the uncertainties of that of that number, to something.  The purpose of assigning a number is to give meaning to the object measured. […] The post Measuring and Counting | Forensic Science appeared first on Lawrence Koplow: Arizona DUI Attorney | Phoenix & Scottsdale.
By Lawrence Koplow 23 Aug, 2020
What Do You Give a Shit About? You probably haven’t really considered the question. Finding the answer is not as easy as it may seem. Looking inward is uncomfortable. Self-examination requires courage. It may also demand change. Once you see what you really give a shit about – you can’t unsee it. Once you define […] The post Give a shit? appeared first on Lawrence Koplow: Arizona DUI Attorney | Phoenix & Scottsdale.
By Lawrence Koplow 10 Aug, 2020
The Vermont Supreme Court holds xx The Constitutional Question xx The Legal Answer(s)  A xx  majority opinion reversed the appellate court decision finding: xx xx XX The Facts Traffic Stop A Vermont state trooper monitoring traffic on an Interstate.  He observed a vehicle traveling northbound without its rear license plate illuminated. The officer stopped the […] The post Validity of Consent To Search | Vermont v. Weisler appeared first on Lawrence Koplow: Arizona DUI Attorney | Phoenix & Scottsdale.
By Lawrence Koplow 05 Aug, 2020
Esketamine Drug DUI Cases Will Become An Issue in Arizona It is well established that Depression is a common and serious health problem. According to the World Health Organization the disease affects more than 264 million people. Common Depression Treatments Depression treatments typically include antidepressant medications that fall in a class of drugs known as […] The post Esketamine DUI: How is it Different than Ketamine? appeared first on Lawrence Koplow: Arizona DUI Attorney | Phoenix & Scottsdale.
By Lawrence Koplow 27 Jul, 2020
Arizona has an incarceration problem. We incarcerate people at a higher rate than most other states and many other countries. Incarcerating such a high rate of people comes with both a social and economic cost. To address these issues, several years ago the Arizona legislature passed a law that authorized a portion of a jail […] The post Home Detention: Approved for Maricopa County in DUI Cases appeared first on Lawrence Koplow: Arizona DUI Attorney | Phoenix & Scottsdale.
By Lawrence Koplow 21 Jul, 2020
In the November 2020 election, a restricted use of recreational marijuana will be on Arizona voter’s ballots. The ballot initiative essentially decriminalizes possession and use of small amounts of cannabis. Currently, possession of marijuana is a felony in Arizona. This initiative would end such prosecutions. Arizona’s Marijuana initiative is titled the Smart and Safe Arizona […] The post 9 Facts About Arizona’s Recreational Marijuana Initiative (2020) appeared first on Lawrence Koplow: Arizona DUI Attorney | Phoenix & Scottsdale.
By Lawrence Koplow 26 Jun, 2020
Justice Gorsuch authored the majority opinion The Legal Question Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on sex.  Does this mean the statute prohibits discrimination based on an individual’s sexual orientation? The Legal Answer Yes.  Employers who fire employees for being gay or transgender violates Title VII of the […] The post Bostock v. Clayton County
Summary appeared first on Lawrence Koplow: Arizona DUI Attorney | Phoenix & Scottsdale.
By Lawrence Koplow 02 May, 2020
Sometimes, what you need, is found in the last place you would ever expect it. When a teenage kid is caught in the middle of trying to steal the tires off the Batmobile you expect something to happen. You expect Batman to dispense his brand of “justice”.   https://youtu.be/7sVDEXfMdXo However, maybe his idea of justice […] The post Strength and Compassion of Batman [Updated 2020] appeared first on Lawrence Koplow: Arizona DUI Attorney | Phoenix & Scottsdale.
More Posts
Share by: